|
Articles
Plan for succession
Author says leaders err when they try to groom people like
themselves
Dave Murphy, Chronicle At Work
Editor
Sunday, August 4, 2002
©2002 San Francisco Chronicle.
As more Baby Boomers prepare for retirement,
companies will have trouble replacing top executives because
they have no effective method of grooming talent, says author
William C. Byham.
Traditional methods of succession planning -
when a supervisor would identify a potential replacement and
try to groom that person for the job - have proven to be ineffective
and time-consuming, says Byham, co-author of "Grow
Your Own Leaders: How to Identify, Develop and Retain Leadership
Talent." He said supervisors look for successors like
themselves, even though the jobs and organizations have changed
so much that people with different skills would be better.
Traditional programs also take a long time,
he said. One company estimated spending 250,000 executive
hours a year completing and discussing replacement- planning
forms.
And companies that try to hire from outside
make mistakes nearly half the time, says Byham, chief executive
officer of Development Dimensions International, a Pennsylvania
consultant specializing in developing leaders. The book is
written with two other DDI executives, Audrey B. Smith and
Matthew J. Paese.
"There is a huge failure rate when going outside,"
Byham said. "There is too much relying on the headhunter screening
the person."
Hiring from outside also can mean that the executive
will take several months to learn about the job and the company,
and that workers down the ladder will resent the lack of promotional
opportunities, Byham said.
"Nobody would say you should get everybody from
inside, either," he said, adding that companies need a good
mix of promotions and outside hires.
Companies face a crisis because many top managers
are near retirement, and businesses have cut middle management
so severely that few potential in-house replacements can be
found, Byham said. Even the middle managers who remain often
don't have what they need to move up.
"They haven't been moved around. They -don't
have the depth of experience."
Byham suggests creating acceleration pools,
taking a few top workers at all levels and grooming them for
promotion - not for one particular job, but for eventually
becoming leaders.
"It's the people who will benefit most from
development," Byham said. Some candidates for promotion wouldn't
be in the pool because they already have the necessary experience.
"The main thing you're doing is giving them experiences."
Byham said that what often happens now is that
potential executives never learn how to change their behavior,
even with extensive training.
"Unfortunately, most people who go through 360-degree
feedback or an assessment center never do anything about it."
He said people in the acceleration pool would
get assignments to help them learn about the organization,
tackle various challenges, develop leadership skills and overcome
any potentially dysfunctional behaviors.
People with those assignments report to their
regular boss and a mentor, someone higher in the organization.
The three meet at the beginning of the assignment, discussing
the worker's goals and how the manager can help, then the
manager and mentor give a progress report to top management
every six months.
The assignments are temporary, but Byham said
they are based on the worker's development rather than a set
time period, so people can't just coast and wait for another
move. "Here we're saying, "You're not going to move until
you're successful in this job.' "
One major concern Byham frequently hears is
that because the pools have to be small, many talented workers
can feel left out. He understands that, but says companies
need to focus on keeping top talent, even if it means losing
people in the second tier.
He said, too, that people from outside the pool
still will be promoted, and other workers can earn their way
in.
"You can enter the pool at any time. It's not
like traditional talent pools, where you have to get in at
the beginning or you're not in at all."
E-mail Dave Murphy at dmurphy@sfchronicle.com.
©2002 San Francisco Chronicle.
|